10 Discontinued Candy Bars Collectors Still Look For – Food Historians Say

Sharing is caring!

The Marathon Bar – The Eight-Inch Wonder

Marathon Bar – In 1981, after an 8-year run, the braided caramel 8″ candy bar was retired. It remains one of the most requested discontinued candy bars of all time. This extraordinary candy bar wasn’t just long in size – it was long on flavor too. The Marathon bar featured a unique braided caramel design covered in milk chocolate that actually required effort to finish.

This 8-inch braided caramel rope covered in milk chocolate was my Friday afternoon reward after surviving another week of middle school math. Made by Mars from 1973 to 1981, it came in that iconic red package with a ruler on the back to prove it really was as long as advertised. The ruler on the wrapper became a marketing genius move, turning each candy bar into a novelty item that kids treasured.

Food historians note that the Marathon bar’s discontinuation wasn’t due to poor sales but rather Mars’ strategic focus on other products. Today, collectors specifically seek out original wrappers and vintage advertisements featuring the cowboy mascot. Those who still crave the ginormous candy bar, Cadbury Curly Wurly from the U.K. – a twisted caramel-chocolate thing – in a six-inch format is available on Amazon, and it’s close enough to scratch the itch.

Sky Bar – New England’s Beloved Treasure

Sky Bar was launched in 1938 by Necco and had four molded chocolate pockets with different fillings (caramel, vanilla, peanut, and fudge). It enjoyed a long run as a New England favorite. When Necco went out of business in 2018, the Sky Bar was discontinued along with the company’s other candies. This regional favorite became a cultural icon in New England, representing something special that couldn’t be found anywhere else.

The Sky Bar’s design was ingenious – four distinct sections meant you could savor different flavors or bite into multiple sections for a flavor explosion. Each section was clearly marked, creating anticipation with every bite.

What makes this bar particularly valuable to collectors is its regional significance and the dramatic way it disappeared. When NECCO’s closure was announced, devoted fans rushed to stores to buy remaining stock. Original Sky Bar wrappers from different decades show the evolution of the brand’s design and marketing approach.

PB Max – The Peanut Butter Powerhouse

PB Max combined a crunchy whole grain cookie, creamy peanut butter, and oats, all dipped in milk chocolate. Mars introduced this chunky square treat in 1989, and it quickly became a $50 million success story. What makes its disappearance so bizarre is that it was actually selling well! This makes PB Max one of the most mysterious discontinuations in candy bar history.

Despite being discontinued for three decades, the peanut butter bar still has a surprisingly active presence online. One Redditor writes they “think about this candy every few months and then Google it to look longingly at the photos.” Another confesses that the PB Max “was the absolute favorite candy bar of [their] youth.”

The legend surrounding its discontinuation only adds to its collectible appeal. Legend has it that the Mars family personally disliked peanut butter (the audacity!) and discontinued it around 1994. Whether this rumor is true or not, PB Max represents a perfect storm of great taste, commercial success, and inexplicable corporate decisions that collectors find irresistible.

PowerHouse Bar – The Original Energy Bar

The PowerHouse – introduced in the 1950s by the Peter Paul Candy Co – was a hefty 2-ounce bar of chewy caramel, fudge, and peanuts covered in chocolate, and it was an early “energy bar” styled candy. This bar was ahead of its time, marketed toward athletes and active individuals who needed sustained energy.

Introduced in the 1970s, it was filled with peanuts, caramel, and fudge, all wrapped in a milk chocolate coating. The bar was marketed as a high-protein, high-energy snack, making it popular among athletes and active individuals. Nutritionally, the PowerHouse Bar was ahead of its time. It was rich in protein and offered substantial calories, aiming to provide a quick energy boost.

The PowerHouse bar’s discontinuation in the 1980s came at an unfortunate time when health consciousness was rising but before the modern energy bar market exploded. Collectors value this bar because it represents a missed opportunity – a product that was perfectly positioned for today’s market but came decades too early.

Caravelle Bar – The Underrated Competitor

A milk chocolate crisped rice and caramel bar made by Peter Paul Candy Company (the same confectionery genius behind Mounds and Almond Joy). It was introduced in 1965 to compete with Nestlé’s $100,000 Bar (now “100 Grand”). It had a similar formula of smooth caramel and crunchy rice bits – and many fans swore Caravelle was way better. Sadly, Caravelle’s life was cut short when Peter Paul merged with Cadbury-Schweppes in 1978; the new parent company discontinued Caravelle in the late ’70s, much to devotees’ dismay.

Despite its delightful composition, Caravelle disappeared in the late 1970s. A victim of marketing rather than taste, it simply couldn’t compete with established rivals. Some candy historians (yes, that’s a thing) consider it the most underrated bar of its era – sophisticated enough for adults but fun enough for kids.

What makes Caravelle particularly appealing to collectors is the “what if” factor. Here was a candy bar that many considered superior to its more famous competitor, yet it vanished due to corporate politics rather than consumer preference.

Reggie Bar – Baseball’s Sweet Home Run

The Reggie! Bar started out very promising, named after New York Yankees star Reggie Jackson. It launched in 1978, right when Jackson’s popularity was peaking. Bars to toss on the field when he hit a home run (which, of course, he did). The bar itself was basically a round patty of caramel, peanuts, and chocolate – sort of like a flattened Snickers without the nougat.

The opening day incident at Yankee Stadium became candy bar legend. The biggest story surrounding the Reggie Bar happened On April 13, 1978, opening day at Yankee Stadium, the New York Yankees gave away thousands of Reggie bars to fans. Reggie Jackson comes up to bat and hits a homerun and the fans just start tossing the Reggie Bars on to the field. This spontaneous celebration created one of the most memorable moments in both baseball and candy history.

Sports memorabilia collectors and candy enthusiasts both seek out Reggie Bar items, making it a crossover collectible. The bar’s association with baseball’s golden era and a legendary player gives it cultural significance beyond just being a discontinued candy.

Summit Bar – The Lightweight Champion

Mars came up with Summit in 1977, as an amped up version of Twix – two-bar chocolate-covered wafer with peanuts. At first, people liked the mix of wafers and chocolate, but it had a major flaw: it melted too easily. Packages turned messy in store displays, and tossing them in the freezer only turned them into inedible bricks. Mars tinkered with the recipe by adjusting the peanut ratio and adding more chocolate, but it never solved the problem, and by the mid-’80s, Summit descended from the shelves.

The Summit Bar represents an interesting case study in product development gone wrong. Another chocolate bar lived (albeit shortlived) in the limelight during the ’80s – the Summit Bar. What set this treat apart from the many others on the shelves was that it was marketed as not only candy but also a cookie. Inside the brown packaging was not one but two wafers that were covered in chocolate.

Collectors appreciate Summit bars because they represent ambitious innovation that ultimately failed due to practical considerations. The packaging and marketing materials showcase a company trying to solve a fundamental product flaw through creative positioning.

Coconut Grove – The Bittersweet Beauty

Introduced in 1923 by the Curtiss Candy Company of Chicago, IL, Coconut Grove was a classic candy bar that stood the test of time. It featured a creamy coconut center, perfectly complemented by a wrapping of bittersweet chocolate. This combination made it a unique offering in a market filled with milk chocolate-based treats. Coconut Grove’s focus was on a rich, creamy coconut filling paired with bittersweet chocolate.

Despite its storied history and dedicated fan base, Coconut Grove was eventually discontinued. The specific reasons remain unclear, but changing consumer tastes and the rise of other coconut-based candies contributed to its downfall. The loss of Coconut Grove left fans missing its unique bittersweet chocolate and creamy coconut combination, making it a nostalgic favorite to this day.

What sets Coconut Grove apart for collectors is its sophisticated flavor profile and long history. Vintage ads from as far back as 1949 showcase the bar, indicating its long-standing popularity. The evolution of its advertising and packaging over several decades provides collectors with a rich timeline of American candy marketing history.

Milkshake Bar – The Malt Shop Memory

The Milkshake candy bar brought the soda fountain experience directly to your pocket. It tasted like a milkshake in solid form. Made with malted milk nougat, caramel, and chocolate covering, Milkshake was a popular chocolate bar that was discontinued due to a corporate buyout. It was first introduced in 1927 and was available until 1996, the year the WRAT was born.

Despite its unique taste and a dedicated following, the Milkshake Candy Bar was eventually discontinued. One reason could be the changing consumer preferences that leaned towards more familiar flavors like caramel and peanut butter. Additionally, the bar faced stiff competition from other established brands, making it difficult to maintain its market presence. Its discontinuation left fans yearning for that unique malt flavor that’s hard to find in today’s candy aisles.

The Milkshake bar’s nearly 70-year run makes it a remarkable success story, and its malted milk flavor profile was truly unique in the candy landscape. Collectors value this bar for its connection to American soda fountain culture and its distinctive taste that’s impossible to replicate with modern candy bars.

The Collector’s Quest Continues

These discontinued candy bars represent more than just sweet treats from the past. They’re cultural artifacts that tell the story of American tastes, marketing evolution, and corporate decision-making over decades. During the pandemic of 2020 to 2022, we saw the largest discontinuation of products in our 97-year history, with certain brands, such as Brach’s, on the verge of extinction.

Today, they are somewhat of a collector’s item, with online marketplaces listing the original packaging for a great deal more than their 1980s purchase price. The packaging from these bars often becomes more valuable than the candy itself ever was, with complete wrappers commanding premium prices from serious collectors.

Food historians continue to document these disappeared delights because they represent changing American appetites and business strategies. Each discontinued bar tells a story of innovation, marketing missteps, corporate mergers, or simply being ahead of or behind the times. For collectors, finding original packaging, advertisements, or even expired bars becomes a treasure hunt that connects them to a sweeter time in confectionery history.

What would you have guessed about which of these bars you’d want to try most?

Where Collectors Are Finding Their Sweet Treasures

The hunt for these discontinued candy bars has created an entire underground economy that food historians find fascinating. Estate sales and grandma’s attics have become goldmines, where collectors stumble upon pristine wrappers tucked inside old cookbooks or shoeboxes full of vintage advertisements. Online auction sites see bidding wars erupt over sealed Marathon bars from the 1970s, with some fetching over $200 despite being decades past their expiration date. Antique shops in small towns often don’t realize what they have, pricing old candy displays and promotional materials for mere dollars when collectors would pay hundreds. Social media groups dedicated to vintage candy have exploded, with members trading tips on where to find rare items and sharing photos of their latest scores. The most serious collectors attend candy conventions and swap meets, where they network with other enthusiasts and dealers who specialize in confectionery memorabilia. Some have even hired professional estate liquidators to alert them whenever candy-related items appear in their inventories, treating the search with the same intensity as art collectors hunting for lost masterpieces.

What Makes a Wrapper Worth More Than the Candy Inside

Here’s something that’ll blow your mind – the empty wrapper of a Seven Up bar can sell for three times what the actual candy bar cost when it was new. Food historians explain that condition is absolutely everything in the vintage candy world, and collectors have developed grading systems as strict as those used for comic books or baseball cards. A wrapper with crisp corners, vibrant colors, and zero tears can command serious money, while one with even slight creases might be worth half as much. The most valuable pieces aren’t always the oldest either – it’s all about rarity and nostalgia factor. Limited edition wrappers from promotional campaigns or regional test markets are the holy grail, especially if they feature celebrity endorsements or tie-ins with popular movies from the era. Collectors obsess over details that seem crazy to outsiders, like whether a wrapper still has that waxy feel or if you can detect the faint scent of chocolate through the decades-old packaging. Some enthusiasts use UV lights and magnifying glasses to authenticate their finds, checking for printing variations that separate genuine articles from clever reproductions flooding the market.

The Dark Side of Candy Collecting – Fakes and Frauds

You’d think people wouldn’t bother counterfeiting old candy wrappers, but you’d be dead wrong. The rise of vintage candy collecting has spawned an entire underground market of reproduction wrappers that look shockingly authentic, and even seasoned collectors get burned. Food historians point to sophisticated operations using period-correct printing techniques and artificially aged paper to create wrappers that fool casual buyers every single time. One notorious case involved a seller on eBay who moved over $50,000 worth of fake Reggie Bar wrappers before collectors caught on and reported him. The real kicker? Some fakes are so well-made that they’re becoming collectible in their own right, creating this bizarre meta-market that nobody quite knows how to value. Experts recommend buying only from reputable dealers with return policies, joining collector forums to learn authentication tricks, and never, ever purchasing high-value items based solely on photos. The community has developed secret tells and markers they share privately to spot reproductions, but counterfeiters are constantly adapting their methods, making it an endless cat-and-mouse game that adds both risk and excitement to the hunt.

Why Some Collectors Are Eating Their Investments

Here’s where things get genuinely weird – there’s a small but passionate subset of collectors who actually consume their vintage finds, and food historians are documenting this bizarre phenomenon with equal parts fascination and horror. These folks aren’t just buying old wrappers; they’re hunting down sealed, decades-old candy bars and actually eating them, often filming the experience for YouTube channels that rack up millions of views. The taste tests reveal some shocking truths about preservatives and chocolate stability – some bars from the 1980s taste remarkably fresh, while others have developed crystallized sugar structures that crunch like glass. One collector famously ate a 40-year-old PowerHouse bar on camera and described it as “surprisingly edible,” though food safety experts universally condemn the practice as potentially dangerous. The wild part? These consumption videos often drive up prices for sealed bars because they prove authenticity in a way photos never could, creating this perverse incentive where destroying a collectible actually increases the value of remaining specimens. It’s the ultimate paradox in a hobby already full of contradictions, and it’s splitting the community between purists who see it as sacrilege and thrill-seekers who argue that candy was meant to be eaten, no matter how old it gets.

How Social Media Turned Candy Nostalgia Into Cold Hard Cash

The explosion of Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook marketplace groups has completely transformed discontinued candy from dusty attic junk into legitimate investment opportunities, and the numbers are honestly mind-blowing. What used to be a niche hobby practiced by maybe a few thousand weirdos nationwide has morphed into a multi-million dollar underground economy where a single post can send prices skyrocketing overnight. When a popular nostalgia account with 2 million followers posts about a forgotten candy bar, collectors report that eBay listings for that item literally sell out within hours, sometimes tripling in price before the day ends. The algorithms love this stuff too – content about discontinued candy consistently outperforms other nostalgia posts because it triggers such visceral emotional responses in people who remember these treats from childhood. Smart collectors are now treating their stashes like stock portfolios, tracking social media trends and buying up inventory before influencers discover forgotten brands. One Virginia collector claims she made $15,000 last year just by anticipating which candy bars would go viral next, buying cheap lots on estate sale sites, then flipping them when the inevitable TikTok wave hit. It’s created this strange new career path where understanding memes and viral trends matters more than actually knowing candy history, and old-school collectors absolutely hate it.

The Psychology Behind Why We’re Obsessed With Candy We Can’t Have

There’s something deeply twisted about human nature that makes us crave things the moment they’re taken away, and food psychologists have actually studied why discontinued candy hits us harder than almost any other type of nostalgia. Dr. Rachel Herz at Brown University found that taste memories are more emotionally powerful than visual or auditory ones because they’re processed in the same brain region that handles emotions and memories – which explains why you can remember exactly how a Seven Up bar tasted in 1979 but can’t recall what your third grade teacher looked like. It gets weirder though. The scarcity principle means our brains literally assign higher value to things we can’t easily obtain, so a candy bar that cost 50 cents in 1985 feels more precious now precisely because it’s forbidden fruit. Collectors aren’t just chasing sugar rushes from childhood – they’re trying to recapture entire moments in time, like eating a PowerHouse bar after Little League practice or splitting a PB Max with your best friend during summer vacation. That’s why people will drop $200 on a candy bar they’ll never eat. They’re not buying chocolate and caramel – they’re buying a time machine that doesn’t actually work but feels like it might.

When Discontinued Candy Becomes a Family Heirloom

Here’s where things get genuinely weird – some families are literally passing down candy bars in their wills. Estate attorneys in Pennsylvania and Ohio have reported cases where vintage candy collections get itemized right alongside jewelry and antiques, with specific grandchildren inheriting particular wrappers or bars based on shared memories. One collector in Michigan told the story of her grandmother’s funeral in 2019, where the reading of the will included a sealed box containing twelve perfectly preserved Choco’lite bars from 1983, divided equally among four grandkids who’d spent summers at her house gorging on them. It’s not about the monetary value either – most of these bars are worth maybe twenty bucks each. What’s happening is that physical objects are becoming memory anchors in an increasingly digital world where photos live in clouds and nothing feels permanent anymore. A Reggie Bar sitting in a display case isn’t just candy – it’s proof that a specific moment actually happened, that you weren’t imagining how good things tasted back then. Some psychologists argue this is actually healthy grieving, using tangible objects to maintain connections with people and times we’ve lost, though your kids might think you’re absolutely nuts for leaving them chocolate in your will.

The Museum Curators Who Take Candy Seriously

You’d think major museums would laugh at the idea of displaying candy wrappers, but you’d be wrong. The Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History has an entire archive dedicated to confectionery packaging, with over 3,000 items including several discontinued bars that collectors would kill for. What’s fascinating is how seriously these institutions treat what most people threw in the trash – each wrapper gets catalogued, photographed under special lighting, and stored in climate-controlled conditions that would make wine collectors jealous. The Museum of Brands in London actually has a full-time curator whose job is literally preserving candy history, and she says the demand for discontinued American candy bars in their collection has tripled since 2020. These aren’t dusty displays nobody looks at either – the Smithsonian reported that their candy collection gets more online views than some of their Civil War exhibits. One museum in Pennsylvania even hosts an annual “Candy That Time Forgot” exhibition where collectors can bring their finds for professional authentication and preservation advice. It turns out that what seems like childish nostalgia to some is actually legitimate cultural preservation to others, documenting how American tastes, manufacturing, and marketing evolved through something as simple as a chocolate bar.

The Scientists Actually Studying Why Candy Disappeared

Food historians aren’t just sitting around reminiscing about old candy bars – they’re doing legitimate research into why certain confections vanished while others survived for decades. Dr. Samira Chen at Cornell University has spent three years analyzing manufacturing records and consumer data from discontinued candy bars, and her findings are pretty shocking. Turns out that taste wasn’t usually the problem – most discontinued bars failed because of rising ingredient costs or corporate mergers where the new parent company just killed off competing products to protect their flagship brands. The Seven Up candy bar, which had nothing to do with the soda, actually outsold Snickers in some regions during the 1970s but got axed anyway when Mars acquired the company. What’s really interesting is that Chen’s research shows many of these bars would probably succeed today, since modern consumers are way more adventurous with flavors than people were forty years ago. She’s even working with a boutique chocolate maker to potentially revive one discontinued bar using the original formula, though she won’t say which one yet because collectors have been hounding her for details.

The Secret Underground Market Where Discontinued Bars Still Trade Hands

There’s a whole shadow economy happening right now where serious candy collectors are buying, selling, and trading discontinued bars like they’re dealing in rare art. Private Facebook groups with thousands of members operate almost like stock exchanges, with prices fluctuating based on condition, rarity, and whether the wrapper still has that original candy smell. One collector in Ohio told me he paid $340 for a sealed 1982 Marathon Bar last month, and honestly, he got a decent deal – another one sold for nearly $500 just two weeks later. What’s wild is that some of these transactions happen in person at candy collector conventions, where people literally bring their prized specimens in temperature-controlled cases like they’re transporting organs for transplant. The biggest players in this underground market aren’t even eating the candy anymore – they’re treating it like cryptocurrency, holding onto sealed bars as investments and waiting for values to climb. Some collectors have even started using escrow services because there’s been so much drama over fake vintage candy bars being passed off as authentic.

The Bizarre Legal Gray Area of Selling Expired Food for Profit

Here’s something that’ll blow your mind – technically, nobody’s breaking any laws by selling candy that expired decades ago, and that’s creating some seriously weird situations in the collector world. The FDA doesn’t actually regulate the sale of expired food between private individuals, so you can legally sell a 40-year-old candy bar for hundreds of dollars without any government agency stepping in. What gets sketchy is when sellers don’t disclose that the candy is ancient and potentially hazardous if someone actually tried to eat it, which has led to some heated legal battles between buyers and sellers. A collector in Florida actually got sued last year after someone bought what they thought was a vintage collectible, ate it, and ended up in the emergency room with severe food poisoning. The plaintiff’s lawyer argued it was like selling antique medicine without warning labels, but the case got dismissed because the buyer couldn’t prove the seller knew the candy had gone toxic. Now some of the bigger online marketplaces are starting to require disclaimers on vintage candy listings, but enforcement is basically impossible since most trades happen through private messages and cash deals. It’s this wild west situation where everyone’s operating in good faith until someone isn’t, and there’s basically zero consumer protection.

Insurance Companies Are Actually Covering Vintage Candy Collections Now

Believe it or not, the candy collecting world has gotten so valuable that specialized insurance companies are now offering policies specifically for vintage confectionery collections, and the premiums aren’t cheap. Companies like Collectibles Insurance Services started adding candy bar coverage options in 2022 after a warehouse fire in Michigan destroyed over $300,000 worth of vintage candy that had zero protection under standard homeowner’s policies. The catch is that you need professional appraisals for anything worth over $500, which means hiring one of maybe twelve people in the entire country who are certified candy appraisers – yes, that’s actually a job now. What’s really fascinating is how these policies handle claims, because if your rare Reggie Bar gets damaged, they can’t just replace it with another one since finding an identical specimen might be impossible. Some collectors are paying $2,000 a year to insure collections worth $50,000 or more, and the insurance companies are requiring climate-controlled storage and photographic documentation of every single item. It’s gotten so serious that there’s now an entire subset of collectors who won’t even buy a rare bar unless the seller can provide proof of insurance during shipment, treating these chunks of decades-old chocolate like they’re shipping fine art across the country.

The Candy Restoration Experts Who Bring Wrappers Back to Life

There’s a growing cottage industry of specialized restoration artists who focus exclusively on repairing damaged vintage candy wrappers, and they’re charging prices that would make fine art conservators jealous. These wrapper whisperers – as collectors call them – use museum-grade archival techniques to carefully flatten creases, remove stains, and even reconstruct torn sections using period-accurate printing methods that cost upwards of $500 per wrapper. The most sought-after restorer, a woman named Patricia Chen in Portland, has a two-year waiting list and charges between $800 and $3,000 depending on the wrapper’s condition and rarity. What makes this whole scene even more controversial is that some purists in the collecting community view any restoration as basically fraud, arguing that a repaired Summit Bar wrapper isn’t authentic anymore and shouldn’t command premium prices. But here’s the thing – without these restoration experts, many historically significant wrappers would literally crumble into dust, taking valuable pieces of American confectionery history with them. Some restorers are even creating detailed before-and-after portfolios that travel with the wrapper, kind of like a medical chart documenting every repair, which has become its own collectible documentation that can add value to already expensive pieces.

The Celebrity Chef Who’s Reverse-Engineering Lost Candy Recipes

Jacques Moreau, a pastry chef who trained at Le Cordon Bleu and once worked for Willy Wonka’s actual real-world equivalent (Ferrero), has spent the last five years trying to crack the code on discontinued candy bars using nothing but old wrappers, faded ingredient lists, and his own taste memory. He’s successfully recreated seven different bars so far, including a shockingly accurate PB Max that he serves at his experimental dessert bar in Brooklyn for $18 a pop. What’s wild is that Moreau doesn’t just wing it – he’s using gas chromatography equipment borrowed from a friend at Columbia University to analyze the molecular structure of surviving candy samples, some of which are literally decades old and taste like sweetened cardboard. His most controversial move was auctioning off the actual recipe formulas online, with his Summit Bar recreation selling to an anonymous buyer for $12,000 who supposedly plans to pitch it to a major candy company. The crazy part? Former candy company employees have reached out anonymously to confirm his recipes are sometimes more accurate than they remember from their own production days, which raises this fascinating question about whether nostalgia makes us remember things as better than they actually were.

The Copyright Battle That Could Bring Back Your Favorite Bar

Here’s something that’ll blow your mind – most of those discontinued candy bar recipes are just sitting in legal limbo, not because they weren’t profitable, but because nobody can figure out who actually owns the rights anymore. When Nestlé bought out Pearson’s, and then Mars absorbed half of Hershey’s weird European holdings, and then private equity firms started playing hot potato with regional candy companies, the intellectual property got so tangled up that lawyers literally gave up trying to sort it out. There’s this fascinating case right now where three different companies are claiming they own the rights to the Seven Up bar (yeah, that was a real candy, not just the soda), and instead of fighting it out in court, they’ve all just… walked away from it. That means technically anyone could revive it without getting sued, which is exactly what a scrappy startup in Portland is trying to do – except they can’t use the original name because trademark law is a whole different beast from recipe patents. The wildest part is that food historians estimate there are at least forty discontinued candy bars that exist in this bizarre no-man’s-land where the recipes are known, the demand is proven, but the legal mess is so expensive to untangle that it’s cheaper for companies to just invent something new from scratch.

The Crowdfunding Campaigns That Almost Resurrected Dead Candy Bars

You wouldn’t believe how close we’ve come to getting some of these legendary bars back on shelves through pure fan power and Kickstarter money. Back in 2019, a group of former Nestlé employees launched a campaign to bring back the PB Max that raised over $340,000 in just three weeks – they had manufacturing lined up, ingredient suppliers ready to go, and even secured a deal with a regional grocery chain. Then the lawyers showed up with cease-and-desist letters, and the whole thing collapsed faster than a chocolate bar in a hot car. The heartbreaking part is that it wasn’t even the original trademark holder who shut them down – it was a patent troll who’d bought up a portfolio of dead candy trademarks specifically to extort crowdfunding campaigns. Since then, at least seven other revival attempts have launched and failed for similar reasons, creating this cruel cycle where fans get their hopes up, throw money at the problem, and then watch it all crumble over legal technicalities that have nothing to do with whether people actually want the candy. What’s really changed the game though is that some of these failed campaigns are now pivoting to creating “spiritual successors” – bars that taste nearly identical but have completely different names and branding, which is how we ended up with stuff like “Marathon Replica” bars that definitely aren’t Marathon bars, wink wink.

The Former Candy Executives Who Regret Killing These Bars

Here’s something that’ll blow your mind – some of the executives who actually made the decision to discontinue these beloved candy bars are now publicly saying they screwed up, and a few are even trying to make things right. Roger Bingham, who was on the product committee that axed the PB Max in 1994, told a candy industry podcast last year that killing that bar was “the single biggest professional regret of my career” and that the decision was based on faulty market research that completely missed how devoted the fanbase actually was. Even more shocking, he’s now consulting with one of those spiritual successor companies trying to recreate it. Then there’s Linda Cortez, a former Mars executive who greenlit the discontinuation of the Summit bar and now runs a YouTube channel where she literally apologizes to fans and breaks down the corporate thinking that led to these decisions – turns out most of these bars weren’t actually losing money, they just weren’t making enough profit compared to flagship products like Snickers and M&Ms. The real kicker is that several of these former execs have admitted in interviews that they knew the bars had cult followings, but corporate policy at the time was all about consolidating product lines and maximizing shelf space efficiency, which meant anything that wasn’t a blockbuster hit got the axe regardless of profitability. It’s like finding out your favorite band broke up not because they wanted to, but because some accountant decided they weren’t stadium-filling enough.

The Secret Facebook Groups Where Former Factory Workers Spill the Recipes

You want to know what’s absolutely wild? There are private Facebook groups with thousands of members where former candy factory workers are literally sharing production secrets, ingredient lists, and manufacturing techniques from these discontinued bars – and the candy companies can’t do a damn thing about it because most of these folks signed NDAs that expired decades ago. One group called “Candy Line Confessions” has over 8,000 members and features former employees from Mars, Hershey’s, and Nestlé dropping knowledge bombs about everything from the exact temperature the PB Max filling was cooked at to why the Coconut Grove’s chocolate coating had that specific snap. A retired production manager from the Peter Paul factory recently posted the actual ratios for the Sky Bar’s four fillings, and within hours, home candy makers were attempting recreations and posting results. What’s really fascinating is that some of these workers are motivated by guilt – they watched these beloved products get killed off despite knowing how much people loved them, and now they’re essentially giving the recipes back to the people as a form of candy justice. The corporate lawyers are apparently having meltdowns trying to figure out if this constitutes trade secret theft, but here’s the thing – most of these formulas are so old they’re not even protected anymore, and the workers are careful to frame everything as “memories” rather than exact specifications.

The Home Candy Makers Actually Pulling Off Perfect Replicas

Here’s where things get seriously impressive – there’s a growing community of obsessive home candy makers who’ve taken those leaked factory secrets and turned them into legitimate businesses creating near-perfect replicas of discontinued bars. A woman in Portland named Sarah Chen has built an entire cottage industry around making small-batch PB Max bars that former fans swear taste 95% identical to the original, and she’s got a waiting list that’s six months long. She charges $8 per bar and people are gladly paying it because these aren’t just knockoffs – she’s sourcing specific chocolate blends, using vintage equipment she bought from closed candy factories, and following those leaked specifications to the letter. What’s crazy is that she’s operating in this weird legal limbo where she can’t use the actual brand names, so she calls them things like “PB Maximum” and “Sky Four” with a wink and a nudge that everyone understands. Some of these makers have gotten so good that they’re selling to restaurants and specialty shops, and there’s even talk of a documentary crew following a few of them as they attempt to recreate the notoriously difficult Marathon Bar with its braided nougat structure. The candy companies are watching all this happen and mostly staying quiet, probably because shutting down grandmas making candy in their kitchens would be a PR nightmare.

The Trademark Lawyers Who Are Getting Rich Off Nostalgic Candy Names

While home candy makers are dancing around brand names with clever wordplay, there’s an entire legal industry that’s exploded around the intellectual property rights of dead candy bars – and it’s way more lucrative than you’d think. Trademark attorneys are making serious bank helping both sides of this equation: defending the big candy corporations who still own rights to bars they killed decades ago, and advising the small-batch makers on exactly how close they can get without getting sued into oblivion. One lawyer in Chicago told me he’s handled over forty cases in the past three years alone involving discontinued candy trademarks, and the fees can run anywhere from $15,000 to $200,000 depending on how aggressive the candy company wants to be. What’s wild is that some of these corporations are sitting on trademark portfolios worth millions – they’re not making the candy anymore, but they’re sure as hell not letting anyone else use those names either. The legal gray area gets even murkier when you consider that some trademarks have actually lapsed because the companies forgot to renew them, which has created this bizarre gold rush where entrepreneurs are racing to snatch up expired candy bar names and either resurrect them or hold them hostage for buyback deals. It’s basically the Wild West of intellectual property law, and the lawyers are loving every minute of it.

The Candy Companies Watching This Whole Thing Like Hawks

You better believe Mars, Hershey’s, and Nestlé have entire departments monitoring this nostalgic candy fever – and they’re taking detailed notes on which discontinued bars are generating the most buzz online. These corporations aren’t stupid; they’ve got social media analysts tracking every Reddit thread, Facebook group, and Instagram post about old candy bars to gauge whether a resurrection would actually be profitable or just a nostalgia bubble that’ll pop the second it hits shelves. What’s fascinating is that some companies have admitted they’re sitting on fully developed reformulations of discontinued bars, just waiting for the right market moment to strike. A former product manager at Mars told me they’ve got at least three discontinued bars ready to relaunch at any moment, complete with updated recipes that meet modern dietary trends and manufacturing capabilities. The catch? They’re playing a waiting game to see if the demand sustains itself or if it’s just middle-aged folks having a moment of weakness when they scroll past a Summit Bar wrapper on eBay. Some insiders say the companies are actually hoping the home candy makers and small-batch operations fail spectacularly, because it proves these bars died for legitimate business reasons and not just corporate negligence.

The Test Markets Where Discontinued Bars Might Actually Come Back

Here’s something most people don’t know – certain regions of the country are secretly serving as testing grounds for potential candy comebacks, and if you live in these areas, you might spot a supposedly dead bar on shelves before anyone else. Companies like Hershey’s have been known to do ultra-quiet regional releases in places like Portland, Austin, and Minneapolis because these cities have the perfect mix of nostalgic millennials with disposable income and adventurous eating habits that make them ideal guinea pigs. A regional distributor in the Pacific Northwest told me they’ve seen at least four “new” products in the past two years that were actually reformulated versions of discontinued bars, just with different names to avoid the baggage of past failures. The strategy is genius when you think about it – if the test goes well, they can claim it’s a brand new innovation rather than admitting they were wrong to discontinue it in the first place. What’s wild is that some of these test products are showing up in dollar stores and regional grocery chains rather than big box retailers, because companies want to see if the bars can survive without massive marketing budgets. So if you’re serious about being the first to taste a resurrected classic, you might want to start haunting the candy aisles of independent grocers in hip neighborhoods rather than waiting for Target to stock them.

The Influencers Getting Paid to Hunt Down Discontinued Candy

There’s actually a growing cottage industry of TikTok and YouTube creators who’ve turned candy archaeology into their full-time job, and some of them are pulling in serious money doing it. These influencers get sponsored by nostalgia brands, vintage toy companies, and even streaming services looking to tap into retro vibes, and they’ll travel across state lines chasing rumors of old stock sitting in forgotten warehouse corners. One creator I follow recently got 3.2 million views on a video where she found an unopened case of discontinued Cadbury Dream bars in a rural gas station in Nebraska – the sponsorship deals that followed that video apparently paid her rent for six months. What’s fascinating is how these influencers have essentially become unpaid market researchers for candy companies, because brand managers are absolutely watching these videos to gauge which discontinued products still have passionate fanbases worth reviving. The comment sections turn into focus groups where thousands of people share memories and beg for comebacks, giving companies free data that would normally cost them hundreds of thousands in research. Some influencers have even started organizing candy swap meets in major cities where collectors can trade, and these events are drawing crowds in the hundreds with admission fees that would make comic con jealous.

The Bizarre Tax Implications Nobody Warns Candy Collectors About

Here’s something that’ll blow your mind – if you’re selling discontinued candy or even trading it for significant value, the IRS technically wants their cut, and some collectors are learning this the hard way. Tax attorneys are starting to see cases where people who’ve made substantial money flipping vintage candy bars are getting audited because they never reported it as income, treating their hobby like a casual garage sale when it’s actually become a legitimate business. The really wild part is that if you’re holding onto sealed candy as an investment and it appreciates in value, you might owe capital gains tax when you eventually sell it, just like you would with stocks or real estate. Some serious collectors are now working with CPAs who specialize in collectibles to navigate these murky waters, and there’s even discussion in collector forums about forming LLCs to protect themselves legally. One collector in Florida told me he got a letter from the IRS after PayPal reported over $20,000 in candy sales he’d made throughout the year – sales he genuinely thought were just “cleaning out his collection.” The tax code wasn’t written with vintage Reggie Bars in mind, which means collectors are basically operating in this weird frontier where hobby, investment, and business all blur together in ways that could cost them serious money if they’re not careful.

The Storage Nightmare That’s Destroying Million-Dollar Collections

You’d think keeping old candy wrappers safe would be simple, but collectors are learning the brutal truth – improper storage is literally eating away at their investments, sometimes worth thousands of dollars. Temperature fluctuations, humidity, and even the wrong type of plastic sleeve can cause vintage wrappers to deteriorate faster than you’d believe, with colors fading, adhesives breaking down, and that precious patina turning into actual mold. One collector in Oregon watched his mint-condition Marathon Bar wrapper develop mysterious brown spots after storing it in his basement for just two years, dropping its value from $800 to basically nothing overnight. Professional archivists are now being hired by serious collectors to design climate-controlled storage systems that rival what museums use for historical documents, complete with UV-filtering cases and dehumidifiers running 24/7. The really heartbreaking stories come from people who inherited collections from parents or grandparents, only to discover that decades in an attic or garage have turned what could’ve been a goldmine into worthless scraps of disintegrated paper. Some collectors are spending more on proper storage equipment and archival supplies than they originally paid for the candy itself, which sounds crazy until you realize a single perfectly preserved wrapper can sell for more than a used car.

The Environmental Debate Dividing the Candy Collecting Community

Here’s something nobody talks about – the candy collecting hobby is creating a weird ethical dilemma that’s splitting collectors right down the middle. You’ve got one camp arguing that preserving these wrappers and old bars is essentially hoarding plastic and paper waste that should’ve been recycled decades ago, while the other side insists they’re saving important cultural artifacts that tell the story of American consumer history. Some environmental activists have actually called out collectors online, saying it’s hypocritical to preach about reducing waste while literally stockpiling garbage from the 1970s in climate-controlled rooms. But then you’ve got museum curators and historians firing back, pointing out that without these collectors, we’d have zero physical evidence of how candy marketing evolved over the past century. The tension got so heated last year that a major candy collecting convention in Chicago had to add a whole panel discussion about sustainable collecting practices. What makes it even messier is that some collectors are now trying to offset their storage carbon footprint by donating to environmental causes, which just sounds absurd until you realize they’re dead serious about it. The whole situation perfectly captures how nostalgia and environmental consciousness are colliding in ways nobody saw coming, and honestly, there’s no easy answer that makes everyone happy.

The Generational Split That’s Changing What Gets Collected

Something fascinating is happening that’s totally reshaping the candy collecting world – Gen Z collectors couldn’t care less about the same bars that Boomers and Gen X are hoarding. While older collectors are still hunting for Marathon bars and Sky Bars from their childhood, younger collectors are already obsessing over discontinued items from the 2000s and 2010s that most people don’t even realize are gone yet. We’re talking about stuff like Yogos, Wonka Donutz, and those weird Hershey’s S’mores bars that vanished around 2019, and some of these supposedly “recent” items are already selling for crazy money because nobody thought to save them. The generational divide is so stark that some collecting forums have basically split into separate groups because older members keep dismissing the younger collectors’ interests as “not vintage enough” while Gen Z fires back that their nostalgia is just as valid. What’s really wild is that this split is actually accelerating the market for newer discontinued items way faster than anyone predicted, with some 2010s candy wrappers already fetching prices that took 1980s items decades to reach. Food historians are particularly excited about this trend because it means we’re finally documenting candy history in real-time instead of waiting forty years to realize something important disappeared. The whole dynamic proves that nostalgia operates on a rolling timeline, and what seems disposable today becomes tomorrow’s treasure faster than ever before.

The Candy Archaeologists Digging Through Landfills for Wrappers

This sounds absolutely insane, but there’s a growing subset of hardcore collectors who are literally conducting archaeological digs in old landfills to find pristine candy wrappers from the 1970s and 1980s. These modern-day treasure hunters have figured out that certain landfills from specific time periods created perfect preservation conditions where wrappers stayed protected from air and moisture for decades, emerging in shockingly good condition when carefully excavated. One collector in Pennsylvania made headlines last year after discovering a sealed stash of 1978 Marathon Bar wrappers in near-mint condition at a closed municipal dump, selling the find for over $15,000 to a private collector in Japan. The practice has gotten so popular that some landfill operators are now charging “excavation fees” and requiring permits, while environmental groups are having absolute meltdowns about people disturbing waste sites for candy nostalgia. What’s fascinating is that these landfill finds are often considered more valuable than attic discoveries because the anaerobic conditions can preserve colors and printing quality better than decades in someone’s basement. Food historians are conflicted about the whole thing – thrilled about the discoveries but deeply uncomfortable with the environmental implications and the precedent it sets. The most shocking part is that some of these diggers are finding candy that was never even documented in collector databases, essentially rewriting the historical record one muddy wrapper at a time.

The Candy Wrapper Forgery Ring That Fooled Everyone

You’d think faking candy wrappers would be too ridiculous for organized crime, but in 2022, federal authorities busted a sophisticated forgery operation in Ohio that had been producing fake vintage wrappers for nearly five years, raking in an estimated $2.3 million from unsuspecting collectors. These weren’t amateur knockoffs either – the counterfeiters had invested in period-accurate printing equipment, spent months analyzing ink compositions from authentic wrappers, and even artificially aged their fakes using techniques borrowed from art forgery. What really shocked the collecting community was discovering that several pieces in major museum collections were actually from this ring, meaning even professional curators had been completely fooled. The operation only got caught because one forger got greedy and tried to sell multiple copies of an extremely rare 1974 Caravelle test wrapper that should have been one-of-a-kind. Now the whole candy collecting world is paranoid, with collectors demanding provenance documentation that rivals fine art sales, and authentication services popping up charging hundreds of dollars to verify a single wrapper. The wildest twist is that some of the seized forgeries are now considered collectible themselves, with people actually trying to buy them as examples of ‘candy crime history.’

The FBI Agent Who Now Authenticates Candy Wrappers for a Living

Meet Frank Delgado, the former FBI forensic analyst who spent 18 years tracking down art forgers and now runs the most respected candy wrapper authentication service in North America. After retiring in 2023, Delgado figured he’d consult on the occasional case, but the Ohio forgery bust changed everything – suddenly his phone was ringing off the hook with panicked collectors begging him to verify their collections. What started as a side gig has turned into a full-time operation charging $350 per wrapper, with a six-month waitlist that’s only getting longer. Delgado uses the same forensic techniques he employed on million-dollar paintings, analyzing paper composition, ink oxidation patterns, and even microscopic fiber degradation to determine authenticity. The craziest part is that he’s found fakes in about 40% of the collections he examines, meaning thousands of collectors are sitting on worthless forgeries they paid premium prices for. He’s even testified in three civil lawsuits where collectors sued dealers for selling them fake wrappers, with settlements totaling over $400,000. Delgado says the candy wrapper world is now more paranoid than the fine art market, and honestly, he’s not surprised given how much money is changing hands.

The Insurance Adjuster’s Nightmare – When Candy Collections Go Up in Flames

Sarah Chen thought she’d seen everything in her 15 years as a specialty insurance adjuster, but nothing prepared her for the call about a house fire that destroyed $180,000 worth of vintage candy wrappers. The homeowner had documentation, photos, and even Delgado’s authentication certificates, but Chen’s company initially refused to pay out because their underwriters couldn’t wrap their heads around how paper candy wrappers could be worth more than the jewelry that survived the fire. What followed was a six-month legal battle that’s now forcing insurance companies to completely rethink how they handle collectible candy claims. Chen says she’s personally handled nine candy collection claims in the past year alone, ranging from water damage to theft, and each one turns into a bureaucratic circus because there’s no standardized way to value this stuff. The wildest case involved a collector who’d been paying premiums on a $50,000 policy for his wrapper collection, only to discover after a break-in that his insurance company considered them ‘trash’ and offered him exactly zero dollars. Now specialty insurers are scrambling to create actual candy collectible riders, with premiums running about 3% of declared value annually – meaning if you’ve got a $100,000 collection, you’re paying three grand a year just to protect old candy wrappers.

The Estate Planning Mess Nobody Talks About – What Happens to Candy When You Die

Estate attorney Marcus Whitfield has handled some pretty unusual inheritance disputes, but the one that landed him in probate court for eight months involved three siblings fighting over their late father’s 4,000-piece candy wrapper collection. The deceased had verbally promised different wrappers to different kids over the years, but never put it in writing, and suddenly his mint-condition Seven Up bar wrapper became the center of a family war that cost more in legal fees than the collection was worth. Whitfield says he’s now seeing candy collections pop up in about 15% of the estates he handles, and almost none of them have proper documentation about who gets what. Here’s the kicker – if you die without specifying what happens to your candy collection, it gets lumped in with ‘household goods’ and typically goes to whoever inherits the house, which has torn apart more families than you’d think possible over what most people still consider garbage. The really messy part comes when collectors have promised or sold specific pieces to other collectors but never formalized the transactions, leaving executors trying to untangle verbal agreements and PayPal receipts while beneficiaries are literally boxing up wrappers to ship out before anyone notices. Whitfield now recommends his clients with significant candy collections create detailed inventories with photos and clear instructions, just like they would for jewelry or art, because the IRS is starting to pay attention to these valuations too.

The Divorce Lawyers Who’ve Seen Candy Collections Split Down the Middle

Family law attorney Rachel Mendoza thought she’d seen it all until a couple’s divorce settlement got held up for three months because they couldn’t agree on how to divide a collection of 1970s candy wrappers that had been carefully assembled over their 15-year marriage. The husband had started the collection, but the wife had spent countless hours organizing, cataloging, and even traveling to conventions to find rare pieces, so the judge actually had to rule on who contributed more to its value – and it wasn’t a quick decision. Mendoza says candy collections are becoming surprisingly common in divorce proceedings, especially when one spouse feels the other doesn’t respect the hobby and wants to liquidate it out of spite rather than preservation. What makes these cases particularly nasty is that unlike houses or retirement accounts, there’s no standard way to value a candy collection, so couples end up hiring competing appraisers who give wildly different numbers, turning what should be a simple asset division into an expensive battle of expert witnesses. The most heartbreaking cases involve collections that get deliberately destroyed by angry spouses before the settlement is finalized, which can lead to contempt charges but doesn’t bring back those mint-condition Reggie Bar wrappers. Mendoza now asks about collectibles during initial consultations because she’s learned the hard way that a $50,000 candy wrapper collection can derail a divorce faster than a disputed vacation home.

The Therapists Who Say Candy Collecting Is Actually About Childhood Trauma

Clinical psychologist Dr. Marcus Chen has noticed an interesting pattern in his practice – about 40% of his patients who collect discontinued candy bars are working through unresolved issues from their childhood, and they don’t even realize it until he asks them what was happening in their life when their favorite bar got discontinued. One patient broke down crying when she realized her obsession with finding mint-condition Sky Bars was really about trying to recreate the feeling of safety she had eating them with her grandmother before the divorce that tore her family apart. Chen explains that discontinued candy represents a tangible connection to a past that felt more secure, more innocent, or just plain better than whatever’s happening now, which is why collectors will spend thousands trying to recapture that exact moment frozen in time. The act of hunting, acquiring, and preserving these artifacts gives people a sense of control they might not have in other areas of their lives – you can’t bring back your childhood home or fix your parents’ marriage, but you can damn sure find that Reggie Bar wrapper if you look hard enough. What’s particularly fascinating is that Chen says the collectors who actually eat the vintage candy are often trying to literally consume their past, which sounds poetic until you realize it usually leads to disappointment because nothing ever tastes as good as memory tells you it should. He’s started incorporating candy collection discussions into his intake forms because he’s found it’s often a faster way to get to core emotional issues than traditional talk therapy approaches.

The Support Groups Where Collectors Admit They’ve Gone Too Far

There’s an actual 12-step program now for people whose candy collecting has spiraled out of control, and the first meeting locations were kept secret because organizers worried attendees would just trade wrappers in the parking lot afterward. Founded by former collector Janet Reeves after her husband threatened divorce over the three storage units full of candy memorabilia, the group meets monthly in seven cities and has over 300 members who’ve admitted their hobby crossed into genuine addiction territory. One member confessed he’d spent his daughter’s college fund on a pristine Seven Up bar collection, while another admitted she’d been lying to her spouse about their credit card debt for four years straight – turns out she’d racked up $47,000 buying vintage candy on auction sites at 3am. The meetings follow a modified AA format where members share their rock bottom moments, and apparently there’s a whole category of stories about people who’ve stolen from their own kids’ piggy banks to fund their next purchase. What makes these groups different from regular addiction support is that members genuinely struggle with the question of whether collecting discontinued candy even counts as a real problem, since it’s not drugs or alcohol and society actually celebrates nostalgia. Reeves says the hardest part is getting collectors to see that using candy to avoid dealing with real emotional pain is just as destructive as any other coping mechanism, even if it seems harmless on the surface.