Ex-LAUSD IT Staffer Faces Felony Charges in $22 Million Kickback Scandal

Posted on

$22 million siphoned from LAUSD in record-setting scam, D.A. says

Food News

Image Credits: Wikimedia; licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Difficulty

Prep time

Cooking time

Total time

Servings

Author

Sharing is caring!

$22 million siphoned from LAUSD in record-setting scam, D.A. says

Inside the Pay-to-Play Arrangement (Image Credits: Pixabay)

Los Angeles – Prosecutors unveiled felony charges against a former Los Angeles Unified School District employee and a Texas-based vendor owner in a scheme that allegedly diverted over $22 million in taxpayer-funded contracts. The case, described as the largest money laundering operation in the district’s history, centered on rigged awards for student information system services.[1][2] Investigators traced the plot back to 2018, when incriminating text messages began surfacing years later.

Inside the Pay-to-Play Arrangement

Hong “Grace” Peng served as a technical project manager in LAUSD’s information technology department. She allegedly manipulated the contract award process to favor Innive, a company owned by Gautham Sampath.[3] The contracts targeted the district’s My Integrated Student Information System, known as MiSiS, which handles critical functions like enrollment, attendance, grades, and schedules.

From 2018 to 2022, Peng participated in selection committees and steered requests for proposals toward Innive. The total value exceeded $22 million. Sampath then routed more than $3 million back to Peng through intermediaries to obscure the trail.[1][4] Prosecutors highlighted this as a classic pay-to-play setup that undermined public trust.

Damning Evidence from Text Exchanges

Text messages between Peng and Sampath formed the backbone of the prosecution’s case. In June 2018, Sampath asked about “other opportunities in Lausd. That we can exploit.” Peng replied that he was “so lucky” because she sat on the selection committee.[2]

Conversations turned explicit on laundering tactics. Peng suggested creating “lot of companies… at least 3-4 to take out the money.” Sampath proposed shell entities in Hong Kong, Singapore, or China. One message stood out: Peng texted, “I broke all law for you already lol.”[2][4] Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan J. Hochman called the evidence undeniable during his announcement.

Felony Charges and Legal Consequences

Peng faces one felony count each of money laundering and having a financial interest in a contract made in her official capacity. Sampath confronts charges of money laundering, financial interest in a contract, and aiding a public official in such misconduct.[1] Bail stands at $500,000 for each defendant.

Defendant Key Charges Maximum Penalty
Hong “Grace” Peng Money laundering; Financial interest in contract Up to 7 years in jail
Gautham Sampath Money laundering; Aiding financial interest Up to 7 years in jail

An arrest warrant issued for Peng, 53, of Pasadena, while authorities seek Sampath’s extradition from Flower Mound, Texas. Arraignments remain unscheduled.[3]

Timeline of the Investigation

The scheme surfaced in April 2022, prompting a joint probe by LAUSD’s Office of Inspector General and the district attorney’s Bureau of Investigation. Late that year, search warrants hit Peng’s home and workplace, leading to her resignation.[1]

  • 2018: Scheme begins with initial contract discussions.
  • 2018-2022: Over $22 million awarded to Innive.
  • April 2022: Case emerges publicly.
  • Late 2022: Peng resigns post-search.
  • March 26, 2026: Felony charges filed.

Meanwhile, LAUSD grapples with separate scandals, including Superintendent Alberto Carvalho’s administrative leave following FBI raids.[2] A district spokesperson declined detailed comment amid ongoing proceedings.

Broader Implications for Public Contracts

“This case involves a blatant abuse of public trust – funneling taxpayer dollars intended for students into personal coffers,” DA Hochman stated.Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office[1] Innive holds active government contracts elsewhere in California and nationwide, raising oversight concerns.

The MiSiS system remains vital for the nation’s second-largest school district, serving over 400,000 students. Such fraud diverts resources from classrooms and highlights vulnerabilities in procurement.

Key Takeaways

  • Alleged $22M in rigged IT contracts for student data system.
  • $3M+ kickbacks laundered via intermediaries.
  • Explicit texts prove intent, per prosecutors.

This scandal underscores the need for robust safeguards in public spending. As LAUSD navigates recovery, accountability measures will shape future trust. What steps should districts take to prevent similar schemes? Tell us in the comments.

Author

Tags:

You might also like these recipes

Leave a Comment