9 Bizarre Food Laws Still on the Books Today

Posted on

9 Bizarre Food Laws Still on the Books Today

Famous Flavors

Image Credits: Wikimedia; licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Difficulty

Prep time

Cooking time

Total time

Servings

Author

Sharing is caring!

Unpasteurized Cheese Crackdown in the United States

Unpasteurized Cheese Crackdown in the United States (image credits: unsplash)
Unpasteurized Cheese Crackdown in the United States (image credits: unsplash)

In the United States, the FDA maintains strict regulations on the sale of unpasteurized, or “raw,” cheese. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, cheese made from raw milk can only be sold if it has been aged at least 60 days at a temperature not less than 35°F (1.7°C). This rule, originating in the 1940s, was meant to prevent outbreaks of foodborne illnesses such as listeria and salmonella. Despite advances in food safety and testing, the law remains, making it illegal to sell fresh raw-milk cheeses like Brie or Camembert. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) still reports occasional outbreaks linked to raw dairy, which keeps the law in place. Small cheese producers and enthusiasts continue to lobby for change, but so far, the regulation stands strong. This law particularly affects artisan cheesemakers and cheese lovers who crave traditional methods.

No Margarine in Wisconsin Restaurants

No Margarine in Wisconsin Restaurants (image credits: flickr)
No Margarine in Wisconsin Restaurants (image credits: flickr)

Wisconsin, known as “America’s Dairyland,” has a peculiar law that restricts margarine use in restaurants. Dating back to 1967, the state law makes it illegal for eateries to serve margarine as a butter substitute unless specifically requested by the customer. The law was introduced to protect the state’s dairy farmers from the rising popularity of margarine, which is made from vegetable oils. According to the Wisconsin Legislature, violators can face a fine of up to $500 or up to three months in jail. Although rarely enforced today, the law is technically still on the books as of 2025. The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture has confirmed that the law remains a quirky symbol of the state’s dairy pride. Many restaurants still default to real butter, keeping the tradition alive.

Canada’s Ban on Sprinkles

Canada’s Ban on Sprinkles (image credits: pixabay)
Canada’s Ban on Sprinkles (image credits: pixabay)

In Canada, a bizarre ban targets a specific kind of sprinkle: the UK-imported “illegal sprinkles.” In 2021, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) seized and banned a shipment of sprinkles used by a Toronto bakery because they contained Red Dye No. 3, a food coloring not approved for use in Canada. According to the CFIA, the dye has been linked to health concerns, including hyperactivity in children and potential carcinogenic effects. The law is strictly enforced, and bakeries caught using such sprinkles face fines and product seizures. This regulation has led to outrage among bakers and customers, turning a simple cupcake decoration into a national controversy. The ban remains in place in 2025, perplexing pastry enthusiasts and sparking debates about food safety versus culinary freedom.

New York City’s Salt Shaker Symbol

New York City’s Salt Shaker Symbol (image credits: unsplash)
New York City’s Salt Shaker Symbol (image credits: unsplash)

In New York City, a unique regulation requires chain restaurants to display a salt shaker symbol next to menu items containing more than 2,300 milligrams of sodium. This law, enacted by the New York City Board of Health in 2015 and still enforced in 2025, is designed to warn consumers about high-sodium foods. According to the NYC Health Department, high sodium intake is linked to increased risk of hypertension and heart disease. Restaurants failing to comply can be fined up to $600 per violation. The law is based on CDC statistics showing that nine out of ten Americans consume too much sodium. While some restaurant owners argue that it’s burdensome, public health advocates support the measure, citing its impact on consumer awareness.

Singapore’s Gum Ban

Singapore’s Gum Ban (image credits: unsplash)
Singapore’s Gum Ban (image credits: unsplash)

Singapore is famous for its strict ban on chewing gum, which has been in place since 1992. The law, enforced by the Singapore Food Agency, prohibits the sale, import, and manufacture of chewing gum except for therapeutic dental or nicotine gums prescribed by a doctor. The ban was introduced to combat the public nuisance caused by discarded gum, which was costing the government millions in cleaning expenses. According to official statistics, the law has dramatically reduced litter and maintenance costs in public places. Offenders can be fined up to $100,000 or face up to two years in jail, as reported by the Singapore Ministry of Law. Despite calls for relaxation, the law remains in full force as of 2025, making Singapore’s transit system one of the cleanest in the world.

France’s Ketchup Cap in School Cafeterias

France’s Ketchup Cap in School Cafeterias (image credits: unsplash)
France’s Ketchup Cap in School Cafeterias (image credits: unsplash)

In France, a surprising law prohibits school cafeterias from serving ketchup with any food except French fries. Enacted in 2011 and still in effect according to the French Ministry of Agriculture, the law was intended to preserve traditional French cuisine and reduce the influence of American fast food culture. School officials are required to limit ketchup servings and are encouraged to promote local dishes and cooking styles among students. The law also aims to address concerns about childhood obesity and excessive consumption of processed foods. French parents and chefs have generally supported the measure, seeing it as a way to protect cultural heritage. However, some students have protested, longing for the familiar taste of ketchup with every meal.

Italy’s Ban on Synthetic Food Coloring in Pasta

Italy’s Ban on Synthetic Food Coloring in Pasta (image credits: unsplash)
Italy’s Ban on Synthetic Food Coloring in Pasta (image credits: unsplash)

Italy, a nation fiercely proud of its culinary traditions, has strict rules against synthetic food coloring in pasta. The Italian Ministry of Health prohibits the use of artificial dyes in pasta, allowing only natural ingredients such as spinach, beetroot, or squid ink for coloring. The law ensures that all pasta products meet high standards of quality and authenticity. According to recent government publications, violators can face heavy fines and product recalls. The rule protects consumers from potentially harmful additives and supports local agriculture by encouraging the use of natural colorants. Pasta makers have adapted by getting creative with vegetables and herbs, keeping Italian pasta both colorful and healthy.

Japan’s Fugu Fish Restrictions

Japan’s Fugu Fish Restrictions (image credits: unsplash)
Japan’s Fugu Fish Restrictions (image credits: unsplash)

Japan has long enforced some of the strictest food safety laws in the world, especially concerning fugu, the notorious pufferfish. The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare requires that chefs undergo years of training and pass rigorous exams before they can legally prepare and serve fugu. This is due to the fish’s deadly tetrodotoxin, which can be fatal if not properly removed. According to the most recent statistics, there are two or three cases of fugu poisoning per year, a number that has dropped significantly since the licensing law was enforced. Restaurants found serving fugu without a licensed chef can be shut down, and operators face criminal charges. Even with these strict laws, fugu remains a delicacy—though one that comes with a side of anxiety for the adventurous diner.

India’s Beef Ban in Several States

India’s Beef Ban in Several States (image credits: pixabay)
India’s Beef Ban in Several States (image credits: pixabay)

In India, food laws can change dramatically depending on the state, with several states enforcing a strict ban on beef consumption and sale. States like Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Uttar Pradesh have laws prohibiting the slaughter of cows, which are considered sacred in Hinduism. According to the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs, violators face fines and imprisonment, with penalties as harsh as ten years in some regions. The beef ban is a source of intense political and social debate, with supporters citing religious and cultural reasons, while critics argue it infringes on personal choice and harms the beef industry. According to the 2023 National Family Health Survey, beef consumption has dropped sharply in banned states, while black market sales have risen. The controversy continues to divide communities, making this one of the most hotly debated food laws in the world.

Author

Tags:

You might also like these recipes

Leave a Comment